Electing WORT
A. Beck 6/14/2012
Just
in case it wasn’t obvious before, the election we have just witnessed in Wisconsin should tell us
all what many of us have
known
for a long time: The ability of immensely rich people to buy
very
persuasive advertisements without revealing who is paying is
equivalent
to putting all supposedly democratic elections up for sale to the highest
bidder. In this election, Scott walker
travelled
the
whole of the United States
in the interest of soliciting funds
from
rich people with special political interests, amounting to class
war
on working people, a tactic that would have been more
obvious
if it had been clear who was paying to spread untraceable messages in the
interests of special economic groups. The
difference
from the groups that were favored by the majority of the Supreme Court, while
not provable, could call up a serious lack of belief in the fairness and
creditability of a Court that seem so
unilateral
as to undermine credibility in the integrity of said Court.
The
selling of election rules, whether for cash or for intangible and secret interests, must be seen as a violation of the
American social
compact.
If the doctrine that money is speech and has the privilege
of
private conversation, even when broadcast in loud, but
unacknowledged
authorship, is a visible bending of the
spirit of the rule of law, and this election makes that clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment